Skip to content

Colorado drug-DUI law · statutory facts · Statutory and agency facts

Drug and Marijuana DUI in Colorado

Colorado drug-related DUI and DWAI law can involve the charged impairment standard, substance, test method and timing, observations, and separate court and DMV records.

By Ike Lucero, Jr., Attorney at Law Sources checked August 22, 2026 Attorney reviewed August 22, 2026
Information, not instructions. A laboratory number, prescription, or marijuana authorization does not by itself determine the charge, impairment, admissibility, or result.

Drug impairment standards

Colorado DUI and DWAI law applies to alcohol, drugs, or a combination. DUI and DWAI use different impairment standards.

Lawful entitlement to use a drug, a prescription, a laboratory result, and the charged impairment standard are distinct statutory and factual subjects.

Marijuana inference

A properly tested whole-blood result containing at least five nanograms of delta-9 THC per milliliter permits a factfinder to infer that the driver was under the influence of one or more drugs. The inference is not mandatory.

A result below five nanograms does not automatically prevent an allegation, and a result at or above five does not automatically establish every element.

Testing and separate proceedings

Colorado’s expressed-consent provisions describe blood, saliva, and urine testing for drug-related investigations when statutory requirements are met. The requested test and an alleged refusal are distinct subjects.

The criminal court case and DMV administrative process are separate. A positive drug test does not automatically create the same administrative action as an alcohol excess-BAC result.

Attorney Ike Lucero, Jr.

Pueblo-based law practice

Consultations by appointment only.

Ike Lucero, Jr. represents Colorado drivers in DUI, traffic, license, DMV, and CDL matters. The Law Office does not accept every matter.

An appointment request allows the office to decide whether it may offer a consultation or accept a matter. A request does not provide legal advice, create an attorney-client relationship, preserve a deadline, or guarantee a result.

About Ike Lucero, Jr.

Common questions

Frequently asked questions

Is five nanograms of THC an automatic marijuana DUI conviction?

No. Colorado law permits an inference from a properly tested whole-blood result of at least five nanograms of delta-9 THC per milliliter, but the inference is not mandatory.

Can an allegation exist below five nanograms?

Yes. A below-five result does not by itself prevent an allegation, and a charge is not the same as a conviction.

Can prescribed medication be involved in DUI or DWAI?

Yes. Colorado’s definitions include drugs, and lawful entitlement is distinct from the charged impairment standard.

Does a positive drug result alone establish impairment?

No. A positive result and the charged statutory impairment standard are distinct subjects.

What drug tests does Colorado expressed-consent law describe?

The statute describes a test or tests of blood, saliva, and urine when its requirements are met.

Can an alleged refusal create a separate DMV action?

Yes. An alleged refusal may become part of the court record and can begin a separate DMV administrative process.

Does a medical-marijuana authorization prevent a DUI allegation?

No. An authorization and the charged statutory impairment standard are distinct subjects.

Official Colorado and federal sources

These official government sources support the factual copy above. Source availability, laws, and agency information can change.

Sources checked August 22, 2026. Attorney reviewed August 22, 2026.

General information only. This page is not legal advice and does not determine a deadline, legal right, driving status, defense, strategy, or result. Website use, downloads, calls, email, texts, forms, and conversations do not create an attorney-client relationship or require the Law Office to act. For a privately retained matter, representation begins only after the Law Office accepts the matter, both parties sign a written engagement agreement, and the required retainer or other initial fee is received and accepted. Information provided before acceptance is not treated as confidential attorney-client communication. Court-appointed work begins only through a valid court or agency appointment. No result is guaranteed.

Public client feedback

What clients have said about working with Ike.

View the Google profile →
“You just feel so comfortable speaking to him like you’ve known him your whole life.”
Gia G. · Google review
“Returning calls on weekends, keeping me up to date on the progress on my case.”
Howard H. · Google review
“He’s professional and shows genuine care.”
Francisco A. · Google review

Reviews reflect individual experiences. Past outcomes and reviews do not guarantee a similar result in another matter.

Consultations by appointment only

Consultation requests

The Law Office reviews each request to decide whether it may offer a consultation or accept a matter. A request does not provide legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.

No Attorney-Client Relationship. Using this website, downloading materials, calling, leaving a voicemail, emailing, texting, or submitting a form does not create an attorney-client relationship with Ike Lucero, Jr. or Ike Lucero, Jr., P.C. Attorney & Counselor at Law and does not make Ike Lucero, Jr. your lawyer. For a privately retained matter, representation begins only after you and the Law Office sign a written engagement agreement and the Law Office receives and accepts the required retainer or other initial fee described in that agreement. Court-appointed work begins only as established by a valid court or agency appointment and applicable law or program rules. Do not send confidential, sensitive, or time-critical information before the office confirms how to provide it. Website information is general, is not legal advice, and no outcome is guaranteed. Read the Full Disclaimer.